Velvet and Angelina are faces in the sense of SCSA when he was a face. He never really changed his way of talking or whatever, he just directed towards the heels.

So putting four guys who are involved in the main matches of the pay-per-view into a tag match on TV just a few days before is "controversial" is it? Funny, I thought it was the standard cliched format of American pro wrestling for the past ten to fifteen years. Must be my mistake.

While I'm in a bitching mood, what was the point in wrestlers vying for the coveted four spots in Ric Flair's new group when there are now six or seven of them? And what relevance does the name Fourtune now have? Does this tie in with the changing of the hand symbol, with WWE's lawyers possibly putting pressure on any resemblance or references to the Horsemen? Or have TNA just given up on the original gimmick entirely off their own backs?

Apparently there's a pay-per-view this Sunday, and they decided to announce some matches for it. Most of which sound about as inconsequential as matches announced on the show before a PPV usually are, with the possible exceptions of Doug Williams vs Sabu if there's a title change, which I think there may be, and Nash/Sting vs Jarrett/Joe which ought to have some development of that angle.

Overall not a great show, which is a shame as I usually enjoy Impact a lot more than WWE's weekly offerings. If No Surrender bombs more than usual, I won't be surprised. Nor was I surprised by the revelation of Tara being Madison Rayne's bodyguard, which I called on here weeks ago, but at least she'll be rid of that ungainly helmet and stupid mask now. Anyone else struggling to buy Velvet Sky as a babyface? I'd still cheer her over Angelina Love any day though.

I wish I could get into wrestling from Japan, Liger look like a Power Ranger, how sweet is that.

Anyone else struggling to buy Velvet Sky as a babyface? I'd still cheer her over Angelina Love any day though.